I do not agree with the annexation of the Philippines, but I am somewhat conflicted on where I stand on this topic. For reasons as stated in the textbook, "Controlling a large and densely populated territory thousands of miles away seemed different, and to many more Americans more ominous." (557 McGraw-Hill) I don't think it was necessary or convenient to try and control land that is so far away from the mainland. Even though the textbook explains that giving up that land to anyone else would only be irresponsible or discreditable, the initial move in on it seems extra to me. I believe similarly with the anti-imperialists league in that it is "immoral, and a repudiation of America's commitment to human freedom." To me as far as US Imperialism, I think the expansion up until the pacific border was logical, but then to move into the Philippines causes major debate over that choice. The textbook explains how the Philippines were unfit to self-govern themselves. This seems to justify the reason for America taking control to me. Overall, I think the U.S. made a decision they seemed was in their best interest at the time.
No comments:
Post a Comment